Eltie Inc. doctrine springs, as do all philosophies, from assumptions of the truth. On the low existential level where such things are to be found, questions about the very nature of reality strongly suggest everything which can follow. Many so-called philosophies don't use this level, they base their assumptions much higher up, and so cannot possibly be correct by logic, but by luck if they are indeed correct at all. Other philosophies use these root questions but draw different assumptions than we, and so reach different conclusions.

In order to derive a useable answer from the unknowable you need to choose based on some external criteria. People tend to use their "gut instinct". We say this is wrong. Logic, as any logician will tell you, is absolute. It is the ultimate tool to derive any answer, particularly ones which have no mathematical or self-obvious (based on psychology) answer. Where logic falls short, as in these cases, there is a form of logic you can use called statistics.

For example, it doesn't matter whether something is true or not if it is vastly more likely to be true than the alternative. From this we gain several good starting "facts" to work with, to build a philosophy upon.

The truth exists regardless of your perception of it - Despite what Schroedinger's cat would have to say on the matter, all the evidence we have, or can get, anything which can be verified in any way says this is true.

Logic is absolute. As long as the premises are true, the conclusion will be true. This is how we get from a to b. Logic proves itself. Only the most basic understanding of what it is is required to prove it in an infinate number of examples.

It's impossible for government to not exist. Even in nature there exists a natural heirarchy. In humans it is markedly more pronounced. Nature abhors a vaccum. Where one exists, something will arise to fill it.

You have rights. Because you had no say in being born, because you were brought into existance without your knowledge or acquiescence, you have the right to exist. What that entails is at least nutrition, sleep, and protection from nature. If you don't have these things, there was never a point for you to exist in the first place, you just die. Our specific definition of a right is "an act or decision which is entirely at your disgression". A right is absolute. Regardless of whether or not you have the means or ability to make use of it, it is still entirely your perogative. The only case in which this can be untrue is when the rights of two or more entities come into conflict. It is there that the courts exist.

Government will exist, but for what purpose? It can only be to govern. It is logically the overall good of those under it that it exists for. Because you have a basic right to exist, and because you are one of the people under a government, it is that government's most basic duty to protect (or provide where it does not already exist) the things required to have that existance.

Just as it is meaningless to have been born without the means of a continued existance, it is meaningless to exist if it doesn't mean anything. Existance by itself is pointless. There must be something further which gives it meaning.

The things which must exist to give existance it's purpose are determined by the intricacies of human nature.

You begin to see how we build from one point to another. In the future this page will have a philosophy tree of sorts showing exactly how each perspective is arrived at.